Kuliah Mini Ekosistem Mangrove sebagai Pemantik Intensi Pro-Lingkungan Siswa Pesisir: Studi Deskriptif–Korelasional (SDG 14)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v6i01.2383Keywords:
ekosistem mangrove, kuliah mini, pemahaman konsep, intensi pro-lingkungan, siswa pesisir, SDG 14Abstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji luaran segera (immediate outcomes) dari kuliah mini (~10 menit) tentang ekologi mangrove dan perlindungan garis pantai terhadap pemahaman konsep (concept understanding/CU) dan intensi pro-lingkungan (pro-environmental intention/PEI) siswa SMA pesisir, serta menguji hubungan CU–PEI. Setelah pembelajaran, 36 siswa mengisi exit ticket 12 butir (6 butir CU dan 6 butir PEI; skala Likert 1–5) yang diturunkan dari tujuan pembelajaran dan ditelaah kesesuaian isinya oleh tim pengajar. Hasil menunjukkan CU berada pada kategori sedang (M = 3,35; SD = 0,38; IK 95% [3,22; 3,47]) sedangkan PEI tinggi (M = 4,35; SD = 0,39; IK 95% [4,22; 4,47]). Korelasi CU–PEI mendekati nol (r = 0,02; IK 95% [−0,31; 0,35]). Reliabilitas internal memadai untuk PEI (α = 0,76) dan borderline untuk CU (α = 0,59), sehingga diperlukan penyempurnaan butir CU serta pelaporan reliabilitas berbasis model (McDonald’s ω) pada studi lanjutan. Secara umum, kuliah mini efektif sebagai pemantik cepat intensi kepedulian pesisir selaras SDG 14, namun penguatan konsep memerlukan tindak lanjut terstruktur.
References
Agarwal, P. K., Bain, P. M., Chamberland, J., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Son, L. K. (2021). How to use retrieval practice effectively in the classroom: Evidence-based recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1133–1173. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09572-4
Bego, M., Brod, G., & Eitel, A. (2024). Retrieval practice supports knowledge transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 18. doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09895-3
Bieleke, M., & Keller, L. (2021). Using implementation intentions to improve students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10, 121–134. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.004
Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022). The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 496–511. doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00089-1
Chyung, S. Y., Hutchinson, D., & Shamsy, J. A. (2020). Evidence-based survey design: Ceiling effects associated with response scales. Performance Improvement, 59, 6–13. doi:10.1002/pfi.21920
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3192–3198. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2024). Longitudinal tests of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 35, 1–52. doi:10.1080/10463283.2023.2225897
Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than alpha for estimating reliability. Communication Methods and Measures, 14, 1–24. doi:10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
Jayson-Quashigah, P. N., Staneva, J., Chen, W., Djath, B., Mahu, E., & Appeaning Addo, K. (2025). Evaluating mangroves as nature-based solutions for coastal protection under current and future sea-level rise scenarios. Frontiers in Marine Science, 12, 1526082. doi:10.3389/fmars.2025.1526082
Jiang, H., Wang, R., & Li, Y. (2022). The effectiveness of micro-lectures in mathematics education: A meta-analysis. Mathematics, 10, 3839. doi:10.3390/math10203839
Karimi, S., & Mohammadimehr, S. (2022). Socio-psychological antecedents of pro-environmental intentions and behaviors among Iranian rural women: An integrative framework. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 979728. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.979728
Kreitchmann, R. S., Abad, F. J., Ponsoda, V., Nieto, M. D., & Morillo, D. (2019). Controlling for response biases in self-report scales. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2309. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02309
Liu, J., & Green, R. J. (2024). Children’s pro-environmental behaviour: A systematic review of the literature. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 205, 107524. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107524
McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23, 412–433. doi:10.1037/met0000144
Meier, S. T. (2022). Investigation of causes of ceiling effects on working alliance measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 949326. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.949326
Menéndez, P., Losada, I. J., Torres-Ortega, S., Narayan, S., & Beck, M. W. (2020). The global flood protection benefits of mangroves. Scientific Reports, 10, 4404. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61136-6
Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., & Apong, R. A. (2024). Microlearning beyond boundaries: A systematic review and a novel framework for improving learning outcomes. Heliyon, 11, e41413. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41413
Narayan, S., Beck, M. W., Reguero, B. G., Losada, I. J., van Wesenbeeck, B., Pontee, N., … Burks-Copes, K. (2016). The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences. PLOS ONE, 11, e0154735. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154735
Paxton, A. B., Riley, T. N., Steenrod, C. L., Puckett, B. J., Alemu, I. J. B., Paliotti, S. T., … Silliman, B. R. (2024). Evidence on the performance of nature-based solutions interventions for coastal protection in biogenic, shallow ecosystems: A systematic map. Environmental Evidence, 13, 28. doi:10.1186/s13750-024-00350-5
Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2019). Reliability from α to ω: A tutorial. Psychological Assessment, 31, 1395–1411. doi:10.1037/pas0000754
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126, 1763–1768. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Świątkowski, W., & Otterbring, T. (2024). Do educational interventions increase children’s pro-environmental behaviors? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, 102163. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102163
Tang, Y., Wu, J., & Lin, C. (2022). The impact of micro-lectures on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11729–11753. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11066-7
van de Wetering, J., Leijten, F., Spitzer, J., & Thomaes, S. (2022). The effectiveness of school-based environmental education on children’s knowledge, attitudes, intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101799. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101799
Whitburn, J., Linklater, W., & Milfont, T. L. (2023). Exposure to nature and children’s pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis. People and Nature, 5, 1034–1056. doi:10.1002/pan3.10495
Xiao, H. (2022). Interval estimation for McDonald’s omega: Methods and practical recommendations. Psych, 4, 867–881. doi:10.3390/psych4040060
Yu, J., & Fang, J. (2022). Effectiveness of microlecture-based teaching on learning outcomes in nursing education: A meta-analysis. Nurse Educator, 47, E28–E33. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001208
Zhao, X., van den Berg, A. E., & de Vries, S. (2024). Nature exposure and students’ pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 91, 128179. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128179
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
